On Thu, Nov 29, 2018 at 11:42:11AM +0100, Miguel Ojeda wrote: > Exactly, thanks a lot for clarifying it up (we should put this in the > commit message, I would say). That also answers my question: it is > clear everything should be back into __KERNEL__. The only worry is > that the v4.19 release contained 815f0ddb346c, so it has them exposed, > so someone could have started relying on them. Or, more likely, the > exposed macros could break some source code out there. Hm... Should a > "fix" be backported?
What about letting v4.19 maintainers make the decision? Should I send a v2 patch updating the comments and Acked-by (you)? Thanks, Xiaozhou