From: Florian Westphal <f...@strlen.de> Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2018 13:47:24 +0100
> After recent tree conversion, we could probably make the exact policies > part of the 'inexact tree' (which would be renamed to 'policy tree' or > some such). > > Special-casing the exact policies made a lot of sense when we had > a single list for the inexact policies (to keep its length down). > > But now I think we could try to unify all of this and only maintain > the existing tree-based storage. > > Would also remove the need to do lookups in two different > data structures (bydst-hash-then-inexact-tree). > > What do you think? I think this makes a lot of sense.
