Currently, "visible" and "depends on", if defined in a menu entry, must appear in that order.
The real example is in drivers/media/tuners/Kconfig: menu "Customize TV tuners" visible if <expr1> depends on <expr2> ... is fine, but you cannot change the property order like this: menu "Customize TV tuners" depends on <expr2> visible if <expr1> Kconfig does not require a specific order of properties. In this case, menu_add_visibility(() and menu_add_dep() are orthogonal. Loosen this unreasonable restriction. Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masah...@socionext.com> --- scripts/kconfig/zconf.y | 14 +++++++------- 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) diff --git a/scripts/kconfig/zconf.y b/scripts/kconfig/zconf.y index eeb449b..7cc8244 100644 --- a/scripts/kconfig/zconf.y +++ b/scripts/kconfig/zconf.y @@ -341,7 +341,7 @@ menu: T_MENU prompt T_EOL printd(DEBUG_PARSE, "%s:%d:menu\n", zconf_curname(), zconf_lineno()); }; -menu_entry: menu visibility_list depends_list +menu_entry: menu menu_option_list { $$ = menu_add_menu(); }; @@ -357,6 +357,12 @@ menu_end: end menu_stmt: menu_entry stmt_list menu_end ; +menu_option_list: + /* empty */ + | menu_option_list visible + | menu_option_list depends +; + source_stmt: T_SOURCE prompt T_EOL { printd(DEBUG_PARSE, "%s:%d:source %s\n", zconf_curname(), zconf_lineno(), $2); @@ -414,12 +420,6 @@ depends: T_DEPENDS T_ON expr T_EOL }; /* visibility option */ - -visibility_list: - /* empty */ - | visibility_list visible -; - visible: T_VISIBLE if_expr T_EOL { menu_add_visibility($2); -- 2.7.4