Currently, "visible" and "depends on", if defined in a menu entry,
must appear in that order.

The real example is in drivers/media/tuners/Kconfig:

  menu "Customize TV tuners"
          visible if <expr1>
          depends on <expr2>

... is fine, but you cannot change the property order like this:

  menu "Customize TV tuners"
          depends on <expr2>
          visible if <expr1>

Kconfig does not require a specific order of properties. In this case,
menu_add_visibility(() and menu_add_dep() are orthogonal.

Loosen this unreasonable restriction.

Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masah...@socionext.com>
---

 scripts/kconfig/zconf.y | 14 +++++++-------
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/scripts/kconfig/zconf.y b/scripts/kconfig/zconf.y
index eeb449b..7cc8244 100644
--- a/scripts/kconfig/zconf.y
+++ b/scripts/kconfig/zconf.y
@@ -341,7 +341,7 @@ menu: T_MENU prompt T_EOL
        printd(DEBUG_PARSE, "%s:%d:menu\n", zconf_curname(), zconf_lineno());
 };
 
-menu_entry: menu visibility_list depends_list
+menu_entry: menu menu_option_list
 {
        $$ = menu_add_menu();
 };
@@ -357,6 +357,12 @@ menu_end: end
 menu_stmt: menu_entry stmt_list menu_end
 ;
 
+menu_option_list:
+         /* empty */
+       | menu_option_list visible
+       | menu_option_list depends
+;
+
 source_stmt: T_SOURCE prompt T_EOL
 {
        printd(DEBUG_PARSE, "%s:%d:source %s\n", zconf_curname(), 
zconf_lineno(), $2);
@@ -414,12 +420,6 @@ depends: T_DEPENDS T_ON expr T_EOL
 };
 
 /* visibility option */
-
-visibility_list:
-         /* empty */
-       | visibility_list visible
-;
-
 visible: T_VISIBLE if_expr T_EOL
 {
        menu_add_visibility($2);
-- 
2.7.4

Reply via email to