Hi Will, On Fri, Oct 12, 2018 at 11:37 AM Vivek Gautam <vivek.gau...@codeaurora.org> wrote: > > > > On 10/12/2018 3:46 AM, Rob Herring wrote: > > On Thu, 11 Oct 2018 15:19:29 +0530, Vivek Gautam wrote: > >> Qcom's implementation of arm,mmu-500 works well with current > >> arm-smmu driver implementation. Adding a soc specific compatible > >> along with arm,mmu-500 makes the bindings future safe. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Vivek Gautam <vivek.gau...@codeaurora.org> > >> --- > >> > >> Changes since v3: > >> - Refined language more to state things directly for the bindings > >> description. > >> > >> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iommu/arm,smmu.txt | 4 ++++ > >> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+) > >> > > Reviewed-by: Rob Herring <r...@kernel.org> > > Thank you Rob. >
Can you please pick this one as well to your tree? This goes on top of the bindings patch for "qcom,smmu-v2". So, it can't go through Andy's tree. Will ask Andy to pick the second patch of the series, that adds the dt node. I guess as I sent this one along with the dt patch, I would have mistakenly added you to 'cc' list rather than 'to' list. Let me know if you would like me to resend it. Thank Vivek -- QUALCOMM INDIA, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation
