On Wed, 2007-07-25 at 09:02 -0700, Ray Lee wrote: > I'd just like updatedb to amortize its work better. If we had some way > to track all filesystem events, updatedb could keep a live and > accurate index on the filesystem. And this isn't just updatedb that > wants that, beagle and tracker et al also want to know filesystem > events so that they can index the documents themselves as well as the > metadata. And if they do it live, that spreads the cost out, including > the VM pressure.
That would be nice. It'd be great if there was a per-filesystem inotify mode. I can't help but think it'd be more efficient than recursing every directory and adding a watch. Or maybe a netlink thing that could buffer events since filesystem mount until a daemon could get around to starting, so none were lost. -- Zan Lynx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
