I made an interesting finding while testing the two patches below.

http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/7/19/685
http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/7/19/687

These patches modify the traditional CONFIG_DEBUG_KERNEL in such a way
that the request_irq prints a warning if after calling the handler it
returned IRQ_HANDLED .

The code looks like this:

int request_irq(unsigned int irq, irq_handler_t handler,
                unsigned long irqflags, const char *devname, void
*dev_id)
.....
        if (irqflags & IRQF_DISABLED) {
                unsigned long flags;

                local_irq_save(flags);
                retval = handler(irq, dev_id);
                local_irq_restore(flags);
        } else
                retval = handler(irq, dev_id);
        if (retval == IRQ_HANDLED) {
                printk(KERN_WARNING
                       "%s (IRQ %d) handled a spurious interrupt\n",
                       devname, irq);
        }
.....

I discovered that i8042_aux_test_irq handles the "fake" interrupt,
which, in principle, is not correct because it obviously isn't a real
interrupt and it could have been a spurious interrupt as well.

The problem is that the interrupt handler unconditionally returns IRQ
handled, which does not seem correct. Anyway I am not very familiar with
this code so I may be missing the whole point. I would appreciate your
comments on this.

Thank you in advance.

Fernando

--

Do not return IRQ_HANDLED when we haven't handle the interrupt.

Signed-off-by: Fernando Luis Vazquez Cao <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---

diff -urNp linux-2.6.23-rc1-mm1-orig/drivers/input/serio/i8042.c 
linux-2.6.23-rc1-mm1/drivers/input/serio/i8042.c
--- linux-2.6.23-rc1-mm1-orig/drivers/input/serio/i8042.c       2007-07-26 
16:10:11.000000000 +0900
+++ linux-2.6.23-rc1-mm1/drivers/input/serio/i8042.c    2007-07-26 
16:05:19.000000000 +0900
@@ -516,6 +516,7 @@ static irqreturn_t __devinit i8042_aux_t
 {
        unsigned long flags;
        unsigned char str, data;
+       int ret;
 
        spin_lock_irqsave(&i8042_lock, flags);
        str = i8042_read_status();
@@ -524,10 +525,13 @@ static irqreturn_t __devinit i8042_aux_t
                if (i8042_irq_being_tested &&
                    data == 0xa5 && (str & I8042_STR_AUXDATA))
                        complete(&i8042_aux_irq_delivered);
+               ret = 1;
        }
+       else
+               ret = 0;
        spin_unlock_irqrestore(&i8042_lock, flags);
 
-       return IRQ_HANDLED;
+       return IRQ_RETVAL(ret);
 }
 
 /*


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to