On Fri, Dec 14, 2018 at 03:07:37PM +0100, Linus Walleij wrote: > On Wed, Dec 5, 2018 at 2:20 PM Uwe Kleine-König > <u.kleine-koe...@pengutronix.de> wrote: > > On Wed, Dec 05, 2018 at 01:19:54PM +0100, Linus Walleij wrote: > > > > > The iio testing driver only needs the trigger and relies on an irq that > > > > then calls the registerd handler. The iio driver doesn't need to tune > > > > the edge sensitivity though and if your mockup driver just only calls > > > > the fire routine if the configured sensitivity justifies that, > > > > everything should work as expected. > > > > > > Simulating edges in the generic IRQ simulator codes seems > > > generally useful to me, even if there is just one user now. > > > > I cannot imagine another potential user. Which kind of driver could use > > that that is not a gpio simulator? > > I suppose anything that can generate an IRQ and wants to generate > some test IRQs where edge matters, drivers/irqchips/?
Should the irqchip be the consumer or the provider of the irq? I would have said the provider as it is an irqchip. What would be the gain of such an irq chip as all users could use a (flexible enough) gpio simulator instead? Best regards Uwe -- Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-König | Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |