I guess they might have to switch to such an asynchronous delivery
system if they want to do this properly. Simply put, your polling
solution is exactly what I do, but I check a flag set by the writer
instead of waking up the readers unconditionally.

Mathieu

Ingo's solution could call waitqueue_active() inside wakeup_readers() to determine if there are waiters. Right?

        Ingo

------------------------------------->
Subject: relay: fix timer madness
From: Ingo Molnar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

remove timer calls (!!!) from deep within the tracing infrastructure.
This was totally bogus code that can cause lockups and worse.
Poll the buffer every 2 jiffies for now.

Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
 kernel/relay.c |   14 +++++---------
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

Index: linux-rt-rebase.q/kernel/relay.c
===================================================================
--- linux-rt-rebase.q.orig/kernel/relay.c
+++ linux-rt-rebase.q/kernel/relay.c
@@ -319,6 +319,10 @@ static void wakeup_readers(unsigned long
 {
        struct rchan_buf *buf = (struct rchan_buf *)data;
        wake_up_interruptible(&buf->read_wait);
+       /*
+        * Stupid polling for now:
+        */
+       mod_timer(&buf->timer, jiffies + 1);
 }
/**
@@ -336,6 +340,7 @@ static void __relay_reset(struct rchan_b
                init_waitqueue_head(&buf->read_wait);
                kref_init(&buf->kref);
                setup_timer(&buf->timer, wakeup_readers, (unsigned long)buf);
+               mod_timer(&buf->timer, jiffies + 1);
        } else
                del_timer_sync(&buf->timer);
@@ -604,15 +609,6 @@ size_t relay_switch_subbuf(struct rchan_
                buf->subbufs_produced++;
                buf->dentry->d_inode->i_size += buf->chan->subbuf_size -
                        buf->padding[old_subbuf];
-               smp_mb();
-               if (waitqueue_active(&buf->read_wait))
-                       /*
-                        * Calling wake_up_interruptible() from here
-                        * will deadlock if we happen to be logging
-                        * from the scheduler (trying to re-grab
-                        * rq->lock), so defer it.
-                        */
-                       __mod_timer(&buf->timer, jiffies + 1);
        }
old = buf->data;


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to