On Tue, 18 Dec 2018 at 11:39, Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezc...@linaro.org> wrote:
>
> On 29/11/2018 18:46, Ulf Hansson wrote:
> > Let's add a data pointer to the genpd_power_state struct, to allow a genpd
> > backend driver to store per state specific data. In order to introduce the
> > pointer, we also need to adopt how genpd frees the allocated data for the
> > default genpd_power_state struct, that it may allocate at pm_genpd_init().
> >
> > More precisely, let's use an internal genpd flag to understand when the
> > states needs to be freed by genpd. When freeing the states data in
> > genpd_remove(), let's also clear the corresponding genpd->states pointer
> > and reset the genpd->state_count. In this way, a genpd backend driver
> > becomes aware of when there is state specific data for it to free.
> >
> > Cc: Lina Iyer <il...@codeaurora.org>
> > Co-developed-by: Lina Iyer <lina.i...@linaro.org>
> > Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hans...@linaro.org>
> > ---
> >
> > Changes in v10:
> > - Update the patch allow backend drivers to free the states specific
> > data during genpd removal. Due to this added complexity, I decided
> > to
> > keep the patch separate, rather than fold it into the patch that
> > makes
> > use of the new void pointer, which was suggested by Rafael.
> > - Claim authorship of the patch as lots of changes has been done since
> > the original pick up from Lina Iyer.
> >
> > ---
> > drivers/base/power/domain.c | 8 ++++++--
> > include/linux/pm_domain.h | 3 ++-
> > 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/base/power/domain.c b/drivers/base/power/domain.c
> > index 7f38a92b444a..e27b91d36a2a 100644
> > --- a/drivers/base/power/domain.c
> > +++ b/drivers/base/power/domain.c
> > @@ -1620,7 +1620,7 @@ static int genpd_set_default_power_state(struct
> > generic_pm_domain *genpd)
> >
> > genpd->states = state;
> > genpd->state_count = 1;
> > - genpd->free = state;
> > + genpd->free_state = true;
> >
> > return 0;
> > }
> > @@ -1736,7 +1736,11 @@ static int genpd_remove(struct generic_pm_domain
> > *genpd)
> > list_del(&genpd->gpd_list_node);
> > genpd_unlock(genpd);
> > cancel_work_sync(&genpd->power_off_work);
> > - kfree(genpd->free);
> > + if (genpd->free_state) {
> > + kfree(genpd->states);
> > + genpd->states = NULL;
> > + genpd->state_count = 0;
>
> Why these two initializations? After genpd_remove, this structure
> shouldn't be used anymore, no ?
Correct.
>
> > + }
>
> Instead of a flag, replacing the 'free' pointer to a 'free' callback
> will allow to keep the free path self-encapsulated in domain.c
>
> genpd->free(genpd->states);
Right, I get your idea and it makes sense. Let me convert to that.
>
> Patch 18/27 can fill this field with its specific free pointer.
Yep!
[...]
Thanks for reviewing!
Kind regards
Uffe
