4.19-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

[ Upstream commit 70bb27b79adf63ea39e37371d09c823c7a8f93ce ]

Commit 8c0e64ac4075 ("thermal: armada: get rid of the ->is_valid()
pointer") removed the unnecessary indirection through a function
pointer, but in doing so, also removed the negation operator too:

-       if (priv->data->is_valid && !priv->data->is_valid(priv)) {
+       if (armada_is_valid(priv)) {

which results in:

armada_thermal f06f808c.thermal: Temperature sensor reading not valid
armada_thermal f2400078.thermal: Temperature sensor reading not valid
armada_thermal f4400078.thermal: Temperature sensor reading not valid

at boot, or whenever the "temp" sysfs file is read.  Replace the
negation operator.

Fixes: 8c0e64ac4075 ("thermal: armada: get rid of the ->is_valid() pointer")
Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+ker...@armlinux.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Eduardo Valentin <edubez...@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sas...@kernel.org>
---
 drivers/thermal/armada_thermal.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/thermal/armada_thermal.c b/drivers/thermal/armada_thermal.c
index 2c2f6d93034e..e16b3cb1808c 100644
--- a/drivers/thermal/armada_thermal.c
+++ b/drivers/thermal/armada_thermal.c
@@ -357,7 +357,7 @@ static int armada_get_temp_legacy(struct 
thermal_zone_device *thermal,
        int ret;
 
        /* Valid check */
-       if (armada_is_valid(priv)) {
+       if (!armada_is_valid(priv)) {
                dev_err(priv->dev,
                        "Temperature sensor reading not valid\n");
                return -EIO;
-- 
2.19.1



Reply via email to