On Fri, Jul 27, 2007 at 01:08:58PM -0600, Chris Friesen wrote: > Rodolfo Giometti wrote: > >> The pps_event() is now protected by a spinlock against >> pps_register_source() and pps_unregister_source()... > > Locks protect data, not code. It may make more sense to identify the > specific data being protected by the spinlock.
What do you mean? Did you find an error into my patch? :-o Functions pps_event() and pps_register_source()/pps_unregister_source() take accesso to shared data, that's why I used spinlocks. Thanks, Rodolfo -- GNU/Linux Solutions e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Linux Device Driver [EMAIL PROTECTED] Embedded Systems [EMAIL PROTECTED] UNIX programming phone: +39 349 2432127 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
