On Thu, 2019-01-03 at 10:17 +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 02-01-19, 22:09, Henry Chen wrote:
> > Add support for performance state of scpsys on mt8183 platform.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Henry Chen <[email protected]>
> > ---
> >  arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8183.dtsi | 21 +++++++++++++++++++++
> >  1 file changed, 21 insertions(+)
> > 
> > diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8183.dtsi 
> > b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8183.dtsi
> > index 47926a7..e396410 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8183.dtsi
> > +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8183.dtsi
> > @@ -9,6 +9,7 @@
> >  #include <dt-bindings/interrupt-controller/irq.h>
> >  #include <dt-bindings/interrupt-controller/arm-gic.h>
> >  #include <dt-bindings/power/mt8183-power.h>
> > +#include <dt-bindings/soc/mtk,dvfsrc.h>
> >  
> >  / {
> >     compatible = "mediatek,mt8183";
> > @@ -243,6 +244,26 @@
> >                           "vpu-3", "vpu-4", "vpu-5";
> >             infracfg = <&infracfg>;
> >             smi_comm = <&smi_common>;
> > +           operating-points-v2 = <&dvfsrc_opp_table>;
> > +           dvfsrc_opp_table: opp-table {
> > +                   compatible = "operating-points-v2-mtk-level";
> > +
> > +                   dvfsrc_vol_min: opp1 {
> > +                           mtk,level = <MT8183_DVFSRC_LEVEL_1>;
> > +                   };
> > +
> > +                   dvfsrc_freq_medium: opp2 {
> > +                           mtk,level = <MT8183_DVFSRC_LEVEL_2>;
> > +                   };
> > +
> > +                   dvfsrc_freq_max: opp3 {
> > +                           mtk,level = <MT8183_DVFSRC_LEVEL_3>;
> > +                   };
> > +
> > +                   dvfsrc_vol_max: opp4 {
> > +                           mtk,level = <MT8183_DVFSRC_LEVEL_4>;
> > +                   };
> > +           };
> >     };
> 
> I don't see a patch which makes use of this OPP table using the required-opps
> thing. Where is that ?
> 

Those user drivers of mt8183(e.g. camera, video decoder,...etc) are
still preparing, so I send this RFC series to check if it is feasible
first then they can apply the interface and send for review later.

Henry 


Reply via email to