In article <91gr99$bs81o$[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you write:
>
>[Dana Lacoste]
>> Essentially, whatever solution is implemented MUST ensure :
>>
>> 1 - glibc will work properly (the headers in /usr/include/* don't
>> change in an incompatible manner)
>>
>> 2 - programs that need to compile against the current kernel MUST
>> be able to do so in a quasi-predictable manner.
>
>(2) is bogus. NO program needs to compile against the current kernel
>headers. The only things that need to compile against the current
>kernel headers are kernel modules and perhaps libc itself.
Or userland libraries/applications that need to bypass libc and make
direct kernel calls because libc hasn't yet implemented those new
kernel calls.
>
>Peter
richard.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Richard Offer Widget FAQ --> http://reality.sgi.com/widgetFAQ/
{X,Motif,Trust} on {Irix,Linux}
__________________________________________http://reality.sgi.com/offer/
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
