4.9-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Cong Wang <[email protected]>

[ Upstream commit 15ef70e286176165d28b0b8a969b422561a68dfc ]

lock_sock() must be used in process context to be race-free with
other lock_sock() callers, for example, tipc_release(). Otherwise
using the spinlock directly can't serialize a parallel tipc_release().

As it is blocking, we have to hold the sock refcnt before
rhashtable_walk_stop() and release it after rhashtable_walk_start().

Fixes: 07f6c4bc048a ("tipc: convert tipc reference table to use generic 
rhashtable")
Reported-by: Dmitry Vyukov <[email protected]>
Cc: Ying Xue <[email protected]>
Cc: Jon Maloy <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Cong Wang <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>
---
 net/tipc/socket.c |    8 ++++++--
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

--- a/net/tipc/socket.c
+++ b/net/tipc/socket.c
@@ -2281,11 +2281,15 @@ void tipc_sk_reinit(struct net *net)
                        goto walk_stop;
 
                while ((tsk = rhashtable_walk_next(&iter)) && !IS_ERR(tsk)) {
-                       spin_lock_bh(&tsk->sk.sk_lock.slock);
+                       sock_hold(&tsk->sk);
+                       rhashtable_walk_stop(&iter);
+                       lock_sock(&tsk->sk);
                        msg = &tsk->phdr;
                        msg_set_prevnode(msg, tn->own_addr);
                        msg_set_orignode(msg, tn->own_addr);
-                       spin_unlock_bh(&tsk->sk.sk_lock.slock);
+                       release_sock(&tsk->sk);
+                       rhashtable_walk_start(&iter);
+                       sock_put(&tsk->sk);
                }
 walk_stop:
                rhashtable_walk_stop(&iter);


Reply via email to