Hi,

On 02.01.2019 0:39, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 24, 2018 at 03:23:13PM +0300, Alexey Budankov wrote:
> 
> SNIP
> 
>> @@ -2143,6 +2152,8 @@ int cmd_record(int argc, const char **argv)
>>      if (verbose > 0)
>>              pr_info("nr_cblocks: %d\n", rec->opts.nr_cblocks);
>>  
>> +    pr_debug("affinity: %s\n", affinity_tags[rec->opts.affinity]);
>> +
>>      err = __cmd_record(&record, argc, argv);
>>  out:
>>      perf_evlist__delete(rec->evlist);
>> diff --git a/tools/perf/perf.h b/tools/perf/perf.h
>> index 388c6dd128b8..69f54529d81f 100644
>> --- a/tools/perf/perf.h
>> +++ b/tools/perf/perf.h
>> @@ -83,6 +83,14 @@ struct record_opts {
>>      clockid_t    clockid;
>>      u64          clockid_res_ns;
>>      int          nr_cblocks;
>> +    int          affinity;
>> +};
>> +
>> +enum perf_affinity {
>> +    PERF_AFFINITY_SYS = 0,
>> +    PERF_AFFINITY_NODE,
>> +    PERF_AFFINITY_CPU,
>> +    PERF_AFFINITY_EOF
> 
> PERF_AFFINITY_MAX might be better name

Corrected in v3.

Thanks,
Alexey

> 
> jirka
> 

Reply via email to