Dnia środa, 9 stycznia 2019 14:43:03 CET Krzysztof Kozlowski pisze:
> According to Devicetree specification, the unit-address must match the
> first address specified in the reg property of the node. Fix the DTC
> warning onenand node:
>
> arch/arm/boot/dts/s5pv210.dtsi:81.29-93.5:
> Warning (simple_bus_reg): /soc/onenand@b0000000: simple-bus unit
> address format error, expected "b0600000"
>
> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k...@kernel.org>
>
> ---
>
> The remaining warning is wrong clock-controller subnode of fimc camera.
> arch/arm/boot/dts/s5pv210.dtsi:578.32-580.6: Warning (simple_bus_reg):
> /soc/camera/clock-controller: missing or empty reg/ranges property
> The subnode in my understanding does not follow bindings and the driver.
> The driver with current s5pv210.dtsi will not register a clock provider... but
> I do not have a device to confirm this.
> ---
> arch/arm/boot/dts/s5pv210.dtsi | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/s5pv210.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/s5pv210.dtsi
> index cc22c9db80d2..26ea5c66d8ce 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/s5pv210.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/s5pv210.dtsi
> @@ -78,7 +78,7 @@
> };
> };
>
> - onenand: onenand@b0000000 {
> + onenand: onenand@b0600000 {
> compatible = "samsung,s5pv210-onenand";
> reg = <0xb0600000 0x2000>,
> <0xb0000000 0x20000>,
>
Checked on Samsung Galaxy S (with local, not yet submited patches for
devicetree support for onenand, which is missing in mainline) and it looks ok
(device probed, was able to use ubi tools).
Tested-by: Paweł Chmiel <pawel.mikolaj.chm...@gmail.com>
