On Wed, Jan 09, 2019 at 07:59:16AM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > * Kees Cook <keesc...@chromium.org> wrote: > > > This was already picked up by x86-urgent... > > > > -Kees > > I'm fine with both routes - if Linus pulls this I'll zap the x86/urgent > one.
The patches are different actually. I've confirmed the one in x86/urgent is correct, and this one is from the initial thread where I was just guessing. The difference is HOSTCFLAGS vs. HOSTLDFLAGS for .o files. So I think we should drop this and just keep the one in x86/urgent. Thanks, Tycho