On 10/01/2019 16:34, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
> On 1/10/19 5:07 AM, Juergen Gross wrote:
>>
>> +void xen_clocksource_suspend(void)
>> +{
>> + xen_clock_value_saved = xen_clocksource_read() - xen_sched_clock_offset;
>
>
> xen_clock_value_saved = xen_sched_clock() maybe?
I wanted xen_clocksource_suspend() and xen_clocksource_resume() to
be symmetrical to each other.
In case you are feeling strong about that, I'm not. :-) So in case
you insist on it I can change it. Or you can do so while committing.
Juergen
