> + if (!force) > + cpu = cpumask_any_and(mask_val, cpu_online_mask); > + else > + cpu = cpumask_first(mask_val);
Any reason for the inverted test? Otherwise this looks fine to me: Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <h...@lst.de>
> + if (!force) > + cpu = cpumask_any_and(mask_val, cpu_online_mask); > + else > + cpu = cpumask_first(mask_val);
Any reason for the inverted test? Otherwise this looks fine to me: Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <h...@lst.de>