4.4-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Liu Bo <bo.li....@oracle.com>
commit 02794222c4132ac003e7281fb71f4ec1645ffc87 upstream.
In a corrupted btrfs image, we can come across this BUG_ON and
get an unreponsive system, but if we return errors instead,
its caller can handle everything gracefully by aborting the current
transaction.
Signed-off-by: Liu Bo <bo.li....@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dste...@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben.hutchi...@codethink.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gre...@linuxfoundation.org>
---
fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c | 8 +++++++-
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- a/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c
@@ -2342,7 +2342,13 @@ static int run_delayed_tree_ref(struct b
ins.type = BTRFS_EXTENT_ITEM_KEY;
}
- BUG_ON(node->ref_mod != 1);
+ if (node->ref_mod != 1) {
+ btrfs_err(root->fs_info,
+ "btree block(%llu) has %d references rather than 1: action %d ref_root
%llu parent %llu",
+ node->bytenr, node->ref_mod, node->action, ref_root,
+ parent);
+ return -EIO;
+ }
if (node->action == BTRFS_ADD_DELAYED_REF && insert_reserved) {
BUG_ON(!extent_op || !extent_op->update_flags);
ret = alloc_reserved_tree_block(trans, root,
