4.4-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Shaokun Zhang <zhangshao...@hisilicon.com>
commit 761333f2f50ccc887aa9957ae829300262c0d15b upstream.
block_group_err shows the group system as a decimal value with a '0x'
prefix, which is somewhat misleading.
Fix it to print hexadecimal, as was intended.
Fixes: fce466eab7ac6 ("btrfs: tree-checker: Verify block_group_item")
Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nbori...@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <w...@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Shaokun Zhang <zhangshao...@hisilicon.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dste...@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dste...@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben.hutchi...@codethink.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gre...@linuxfoundation.org>
---
fs/btrfs/tree-checker.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- a/fs/btrfs/tree-checker.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/tree-checker.c
@@ -399,7 +399,7 @@ static int check_block_group_item(struct
type != (BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_METADATA |
BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_DATA)) {
block_group_err(fs_info, leaf, slot,
-"invalid type, have 0x%llx (%lu bits set) expect either 0x%llx, 0x%llx, 0x%llu
or 0x%llx",
+"invalid type, have 0x%llx (%lu bits set) expect either 0x%llx, 0x%llx, 0x%llx
or 0x%llx",
type, hweight64(type),
BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_DATA, BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_METADATA,
BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_SYSTEM,
