Pls ignore this duplicated patch.
On 2019/1/16 13:33, YueHaibing wrote:
> Fix the follow sparse warning:
>
> security/security.c:533:5: warning: symbol 'lsm_task_alloc' was not declared.
> Should it be static?
> security/security.c:554:5: warning: symbol 'lsm_ipc_alloc' was not declared.
> Should it be static?
> security/security.c:575:5: warning: symbol 'lsm_msg_msg_alloc' was not
> declared. Should it be static?
>
> Signed-off-by: YueHaibing <yuehaib...@huawei.com>
> ---
> security/security.c | 6 +++---
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/security/security.c b/security/security.c
> index 9a98c52..750d3f3 100644
> --- a/security/security.c
> +++ b/security/security.c
> @@ -530,7 +530,7 @@ int lsm_inode_alloc(struct inode *inode)
> *
> * Returns 0, or -ENOMEM if memory can't be allocated.
> */
> -int lsm_task_alloc(struct task_struct *task)
> +static int lsm_task_alloc(struct task_struct *task)
> {
> if (blob_sizes.lbs_task == 0) {
> task->security = NULL;
> @@ -551,7 +551,7 @@ int lsm_task_alloc(struct task_struct *task)
> *
> * Returns 0, or -ENOMEM if memory can't be allocated.
> */
> -int lsm_ipc_alloc(struct kern_ipc_perm *kip)
> +static int lsm_ipc_alloc(struct kern_ipc_perm *kip)
> {
> if (blob_sizes.lbs_ipc == 0) {
> kip->security = NULL;
> @@ -572,7 +572,7 @@ int lsm_ipc_alloc(struct kern_ipc_perm *kip)
> *
> * Returns 0, or -ENOMEM if memory can't be allocated.
> */
> -int lsm_msg_msg_alloc(struct msg_msg *mp)
> +static int lsm_msg_msg_alloc(struct msg_msg *mp)
> {
> if (blob_sizes.lbs_msg_msg == 0) {
> mp->security = NULL;
>
