Al Viro writes: > Actually, the real problem is different - WTF do we need that typeof > anyway? > int ret_warn_on = !!(condition); > [same as now] > will work just fine...
It will mean more code on architectures which have a conditional-trap-on-nonzero instruction, such as powerpc, since the compiler will generate instructions to evaluate !!x. But I don't see any reason why ret_warn_on couldn't be a long. Paul. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
