On Tue, Jan 22, 2019 at 02:01:15PM +0000, Patrick Bellasi wrote:
> On 22-Jan 14:28, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 22, 2019 at 10:43:05AM +0000, Patrick Bellasi wrote:
> > > On 22-Jan 10:37, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> >
> > > > Sure, I get that. What I don't get is why you're adding that (2) here.
> > > > Like said, __sched_setscheduler() already does a dequeue/enqueue under
> > > > rq->lock, which should already take care of that.
> > >
> > > Oh, ok... got it what you mean now.
> > >
> > > With:
> > >
> > > [PATCH v6 01/16] sched/core: Allow sched_setattr() to use the current
> > > policy
> > > <20190115101513.2822-2-patrick.bell...@arm.com>
> > >
> > > we can call __sched_setscheduler() with:
> > >
> > > attr->sched_flags & SCHED_FLAG_KEEP_POLICY
> > >
> > > whenever we want just to change the clamp values of a task without
> > > changing its class. Thus, we can end up returning from
> > > __sched_setscheduler() without doing an actual dequeue/enqueue.
> >
> > I don't see that happening.. when KEEP_POLICY we set attr.sched_policy =
> > SETPARAM_POLICY. That is then checked again in __setscheduler_param(),
> > which is in the middle of that dequeue/enqueue.
>
> Yes, I think I've forgot a check before we actually dequeue the task.
>
> The current code does:
>
> ---8<---
> SYSCALL_DEFINE3(sched_setattr)
>
> // A) request to keep the same policy
> if (attr.sched_flags & SCHED_FLAG_KEEP_POLICY)
> attr.sched_policy = SETPARAM_POLICY;
>
> sched_setattr()
> // B) actually enforce the same policy
> if (policy < 0)
> policy = oldpolicy = p->policy;
>
> // C) tune the clamp values
> if (attr->sched_flags & SCHED_FLAG_UTIL_CLAMP)
> retval = __setscheduler_uclamp(p, attr);
>
> // D) tune attributes if policy is the same
> if (unlikely(policy == p->policy))
> if (fair_policy(policy) && attr->sched_nice != task_nice(p))
> goto change;
> if (rt_policy(policy) && attr->sched_priority !=
> p->rt_priority)
> goto change;
> if (dl_policy(policy) && dl_param_changed(p, attr))
> goto change;
if (util_changed)
goto change;
?
> return 0;
> change:
>
> // E) dequeue/enqueue task
> ---8<---
>
> So, probably in D) I've missed a check on SCHED_FLAG_KEEP_POLICY to
> enforce a return in that case...
>
> > Also, and this might be 'broken', SETPARAM_POLICY _does_ reset all the
> > other attributes, it only preserves policy, but it will (re)set nice
> > level for example (see that same function).
>
> Mmm... right... my bad! :/
>
> > So maybe we want to introduce another (few?) FLAG_KEEP flag(s) that
> > preserve the other bits; I'm thinking at least KEEP_PARAM and KEEP_UTIL
> > or something.
>
> Yes, I would say we have two options:
>
> 1) SCHED_FLAG_KEEP_POLICY enforces all the scheduling class specific
> attributes, but cross class attributes (e.g. uclamp)
>
> 2) add SCHED_KEEP_NICE, SCHED_KEEP_PRIO, and SCED_KEEP_PARAMS
> and use them in the if conditions in D)
So the current KEEP_POLICY basically provides sched_setparam(), and
given we have that as a syscall, that is supposedly a useful
functionality.
Also, NICE/PRIO/DL* is all the same thing and depends on the policy,
KEEP_PARAM should cover the lot
And I suppose the UTIL_CLAMP is !KEEP_UTIL; we could go either way
around with that flag.
> In both cases the goal should be to return from code block D).
I don't think so; we really do want to 'goto change' for util changes
too I think. Why duplicate part of that logic?
