On Wed, Jan 23, 2019 at 09:11:41AM +0900, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
> On Tue, 22 Jan 2019 16:21:44 +0100
> Greg Kroah-Hartman <gre...@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> > When calling debugfs functions, there is no need to ever check the
> > return value. The function can work or not, but the code logic should
> > never do something different based on this.
>
> Ah, OK. It simplifies the code. But I have a question below,
>
> >
> > Cc: Masami Hiramatsu <mhira...@kernel.org>
> > Cc: Kees Cook <keesc...@chromium.org>
> > Cc: Josef Bacik <jba...@fb.com>
> > Cc: Thomas Gleixner <t...@linutronix.de>
> > Cc: "Naveen N. Rao" <naveen.n....@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> > Cc: zhong jiang <zhongji...@huawei.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gre...@linuxfoundation.org>
> > ---
> > kernel/fail_function.c | 23 +++++------------------
> > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/kernel/fail_function.c b/kernel/fail_function.c
> > index 17f75b545f66..afc779be5ebb 100644
> > --- a/kernel/fail_function.c
> > +++ b/kernel/fail_function.c
> > @@ -152,20 +152,13 @@ static int fei_retval_get(void *data, u64 *val)
> > DEFINE_DEBUGFS_ATTRIBUTE(fei_retval_ops, fei_retval_get, fei_retval_set,
> > "%llx\n");
> >
> > -static int fei_debugfs_add_attr(struct fei_attr *attr)
> > +static void fei_debugfs_add_attr(struct fei_attr *attr)
> > {
> > struct dentry *dir;
> >
> > dir = debugfs_create_dir(attr->kp.symbol_name, fei_debugfs_dir);
> > - if (!dir)
> > - return -ENOMEM;
> > -
> > - if (!debugfs_create_file("retval", 0600, dir, attr, &fei_retval_ops)) {
> > - debugfs_remove_recursive(dir);
> > - return -ENOMEM;
> > - }
> >
> > - return 0;
>
> Don't we need to check dir here? If above debugfs_create_dir() returns NULL,
> it seems we will create "retval" under root directory of debugfs.
If NULL is returned, your system is out of memory and worse things are
about to happen :)
thanks,
greg k-h
