In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases
where we are expecting to fall through.
This patch fixes the following warnings:
drivers/block/drbd/drbd_int.h:1774:6: warning: this statement may fall through
[-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
drivers/block/drbd/drbd_int.h:1774:6: warning: this statement may fall through
[-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
drivers/block/drbd/drbd_int.h:1774:6: warning: this statement may fall through
[-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
drivers/block/drbd/drbd_int.h:1774:6: warning: this statement may fall through
[-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
drivers/block/drbd/drbd_int.h:1774:6: warning: this statement may fall through
[-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
drivers/block/drbd/drbd_receiver.c:3093:6: warning: this statement may fall
through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
drivers/block/drbd/drbd_receiver.c:3120:6: warning: this statement may fall
through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
drivers/block/drbd/drbd_req.c:856:6: warning: this statement may fall through
[-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
Warning level 3 was used: -Wimplicit-fallthrough=3
This patch is part of the ongoing efforts to enabling
-Wimplicit-fallthrough
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gust...@embeddedor.com>
---
drivers/block/drbd/drbd_int.h | 2 +-
drivers/block/drbd/drbd_receiver.c | 4 ++--
drivers/block/drbd/drbd_req.c | 2 +-
drivers/block/rsxx/core.c | 1 +
4 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/block/drbd/drbd_int.h b/drivers/block/drbd/drbd_int.h
index 000a2f4c0e92..f070f7200fc0 100644
--- a/drivers/block/drbd/drbd_int.h
+++ b/drivers/block/drbd/drbd_int.h
@@ -1778,7 +1778,7 @@ static inline void __drbd_chk_io_error_(struct
drbd_device *device,
_drbd_set_state(_NS(device, disk,
D_INCONSISTENT), CS_HARD, NULL);
break;
}
- /* NOTE fall through for DRBD_META_IO_ERROR or
DRBD_FORCE_DETACH */
+ /* fall through - for DRBD_META_IO_ERROR or DRBD_FORCE_DETACH */
case EP_DETACH:
case EP_CALL_HELPER:
/* Remember whether we saw a READ or WRITE error.
diff --git a/drivers/block/drbd/drbd_receiver.c
b/drivers/block/drbd/drbd_receiver.c
index c7ad88d91a09..74350663443f 100644
--- a/drivers/block/drbd/drbd_receiver.c
+++ b/drivers/block/drbd/drbd_receiver.c
@@ -3094,7 +3094,7 @@ static int drbd_asb_recover_0p(struct drbd_peer_device
*peer_device) __must_hold
rv = 1;
break;
}
- /* Else fall through to one of the other strategies... */
+ /* Else fall through - to one of the other strategies... */
case ASB_DISCARD_OLDER_PRI:
if (self == 0 && peer == 1) {
rv = 1;
@@ -3119,7 +3119,7 @@ static int drbd_asb_recover_0p(struct drbd_peer_device
*peer_device) __must_hold
}
if (after_sb_0p == ASB_DISCARD_ZERO_CHG)
break;
- /* else: fall through */
+ /* else, fall through */
case ASB_DISCARD_LEAST_CHG:
if (ch_self < ch_peer)
rv = -1;
diff --git a/drivers/block/drbd/drbd_req.c b/drivers/block/drbd/drbd_req.c
index 643a04af213b..3809c7e6be8c 100644
--- a/drivers/block/drbd/drbd_req.c
+++ b/drivers/block/drbd/drbd_req.c
@@ -866,7 +866,7 @@ int __req_mod(struct drbd_request *req, enum drbd_req_event
what,
} /* else: FIXME can this happen? */
break;
}
- /* else, fall through to BARRIER_ACKED */
+ /* else, fall through - to BARRIER_ACKED */
case BARRIER_ACKED:
/* barrier ack for READ requests does not make sense */
diff --git a/drivers/block/rsxx/core.c b/drivers/block/rsxx/core.c
index 0cf4509d575c..898d522e8338 100644
--- a/drivers/block/rsxx/core.c
+++ b/drivers/block/rsxx/core.c
@@ -439,6 +439,7 @@ static void card_state_change(struct rsxx_cardinfo *card,
* Fall through so the DMA devices can be attached and
* the user can attempt to pull off their data.
*/
+ /* fall through */
case CARD_STATE_GOOD:
st = rsxx_get_card_size8(card, &card->size8);
if (st)
--
2.20.1
