On Wed, Jan 23, 2019 at 11:29:30AM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 23, 2019 at 11:28:14AM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > When an error happens, debugfs should return an error pointer value, not
> > NULL. This will prevent the totally theoretical error where a debugfs
> > call fails due to lack of memory, returning NULL, and that dentry value
> > is then passed to another debugfs call, which would end up succeeding,
> > creating a file at the root of the debugfs tree, but would then be
> > impossible to remove (because you can not remove the directory NULL).
> >
> > So, to make everyone happy, always return errors, this makes the users
> > of debugfs much simpler (they do not have to ever check the return
> > value), and everyone can rest easy.
> >
> > Reported-by: Masami Hiramatsu <[email protected]>
> > Reported-by: Ulf Hansson <[email protected]>
> > Reported-by: Gary R Hook <[email protected]>
> > Reported-by: Heiko Carstens <[email protected]>
>
> Oops, also reported by:
> Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <[email protected]>
And also reported by:
Michal Hocko <[email protected]>
I should have checked my inbox better...
