On Wed, Jan 16, 2019 at 03:18:42PM +0000, Phil Edworthy wrote: > Hi, > > Any other comments on this patch and patch 2/2 > (https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/12/3/326)?
Was on vacations, sorry. > > > I would start new sentence from new line (this will emphasize the > > > possible > > > variants) > > > > > > * This is ... > > I disagree, the explanation is specifically related to the case where the > > function returns -EINVAL. Though this is a nit, so I'm not really bothered > > either way. Ah, okay. You may bear my tags on. -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko
