On Thu, Jan 24, 2019 at 2:19 PM Javier González <jav...@javigon.com> wrote: > > > On 22 Jan 2019, at 11.15, h...@owltronix.com wrote: > > > > From: Hans Holmberg <hans.holmb...@cnexlabs.com> > > > > pblk_line_meta_free might sleep (it can end up calling vfree, depending > > on how we allocate lba lists), and this can lead to a BUG() > > if we wake up on a different cpu and release the lock. > > > > As there is no point of grabbing the free lock when pblk has shut down, > > remove the lock. > > > > Signed-off-by: Hans Holmberg <hans.holmb...@cnexlabs.com> > > --- > > drivers/lightnvm/pblk-init.c | 2 -- > > 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/lightnvm/pblk-init.c b/drivers/lightnvm/pblk-init.c > > index f9a3e47b6a93..eb0135c77805 100644 > > --- a/drivers/lightnvm/pblk-init.c > > +++ b/drivers/lightnvm/pblk-init.c > > @@ -584,14 +584,12 @@ static void pblk_lines_free(struct pblk *pblk) > > struct pblk_line *line; > > int i; > > > > - spin_lock(&l_mg->free_lock); > > for (i = 0; i < l_mg->nr_lines; i++) { > > line = &pblk->lines[i]; > > > > pblk_line_free(line); > > pblk_line_meta_free(l_mg, line); > > } > > - spin_unlock(&l_mg->free_lock); > > > > pblk_line_mg_free(pblk); > > > > -- > > 2.17.1 > > Can you add a comment too indicating that this is only safe on a single > threaded shutdown?
To be able to free the lines, we need have stopped anything accessing the lines first. That seems obvious to me. It would be nice to make a pass over the code and document pblk's locking(and other concurrency handling, like the line krefs) though. Thanks, Hans > > Otherwise the patch looks good. > > Reviewed-by: Javier González <jav...@javigon.com> >