On Fri, Jan 25, 2019 at 9:12 PM Maxime Ripard <maxime.rip...@bootlin.com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jan 24, 2019 at 11:37:33PM +0530, Jagan Teki wrote:
> > CSI block in Allwinner A64 has similar features as like in H3,
> > but the default CSI_SCLK rate cannot work properly to drive the
> > connected sensor interface.
> >
> > The tested mod cock rate is 300 MHz and BSP vfe media driver is also
> > using the same rate. Unfortunately there is no valid information about
> > clock rate in manual or any other sources except the BSP driver. so more
> > faith on BSP code, because same has tested in mainline.
> >
> > So, add support for A64 CSI block by setting updated mod clock rate.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jagan Teki <ja...@amarulasolutions.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/media/platform/sunxi/sun6i-csi/sun6i_csi.c | 13 ++++++++++++-
> >  1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/media/platform/sunxi/sun6i-csi/sun6i_csi.c 
> > b/drivers/media/platform/sunxi/sun6i-csi/sun6i_csi.c
> > index ee882b66a5ea..cd2d33242c17 100644
> > --- a/drivers/media/platform/sunxi/sun6i-csi/sun6i_csi.c
> > +++ b/drivers/media/platform/sunxi/sun6i-csi/sun6i_csi.c
> > @@ -15,6 +15,7 @@
> >  #include <linux/ioctl.h>
> >  #include <linux/module.h>
> >  #include <linux/of.h>
> > +#include <linux/of_device.h>
> >  #include <linux/platform_device.h>
> >  #include <linux/pm_runtime.h>
> >  #include <linux/regmap.h>
> > @@ -154,6 +155,7 @@ bool sun6i_csi_is_format_supported(struct sun6i_csi 
> > *csi,
> >  int sun6i_csi_set_power(struct sun6i_csi *csi, bool enable)
> >  {
> >       struct sun6i_csi_dev *sdev = sun6i_csi_to_dev(csi);
> > +     struct device *dev = sdev->dev;
> >       struct regmap *regmap = sdev->regmap;
> >       int ret;
> >
> > @@ -161,15 +163,20 @@ int sun6i_csi_set_power(struct sun6i_csi *csi, bool 
> > enable)
> >               regmap_update_bits(regmap, CSI_EN_REG, CSI_EN_CSI_EN, 0);
> >
> >               clk_disable_unprepare(sdev->clk_ram);
> > +             if (of_device_is_compatible(dev->of_node, 
> > "allwinner,sun50i-a64-csi"))
> > +                     clk_rate_exclusive_put(sdev->clk_mod);
> >               clk_disable_unprepare(sdev->clk_mod);
> >               reset_control_assert(sdev->rstc_bus);
> >               return 0;
> >       }
> >
> > +     if (of_device_is_compatible(dev->of_node, "allwinner,sun50i-a64-csi"))
> > +             clk_set_rate_exclusive(sdev->clk_mod, 300000000);
> > +
> >       ret = clk_prepare_enable(sdev->clk_mod);
> >       if (ret) {
> >               dev_err(sdev->dev, "Enable csi clk err %d\n", ret);
> > -             return ret;
> > +             goto clk_mod_put;
> >       }
> >
> >       ret = clk_prepare_enable(sdev->clk_ram);
> > @@ -192,6 +199,9 @@ int sun6i_csi_set_power(struct sun6i_csi *csi, bool 
> > enable)
> >       clk_disable_unprepare(sdev->clk_ram);
> >  clk_mod_disable:
> >       clk_disable_unprepare(sdev->clk_mod);
> > +clk_mod_put:
> > +     if (of_device_is_compatible(dev->of_node, "allwinner,sun50i-a64-csi"))
> > +             clk_rate_exclusive_put(sdev->clk_mod);
> >       return ret;
>
> The sequence in the error path and in the disable path aren't the same, why?

True, it should be similar sequence, will fix and send next version. thanks!

Reply via email to