On Mon, 21 Jan 2019 15:33:39 +0000,
Julien Thierry <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> Provide a higher priority to be used for pseudo-NMIs. When such an
> interrupt is received, keep interrupts fully disabled at CPU level to
> prevent receiving other pseudo-NMIs while handling the current one.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Julien Thierry <[email protected]>
> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
> Cc: Jason Cooper <[email protected]>
> Cc: Marc Zyngier <[email protected]>
> ---
>  drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3.c | 42 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
>  1 file changed, 36 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3.c
> index 5374b43..4df1e94 100644
> --- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3.c
> +++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3.c
> @@ -41,6 +41,8 @@
>  
>  #include "irq-gic-common.h"
>  
> +#define GICD_INT_NMI_PRI     (GICD_INT_DEF_PRI & ~0x80)
> +
>  #define FLAGS_WORKAROUND_GICR_WAKER_MSM8996  (1ULL << 0)
>  
>  struct redist_region {
> @@ -381,12 +383,45 @@ static u64 gic_mpidr_to_affinity(unsigned long mpidr)
>       return aff;
>  }
>  
> +static inline void gic_deactivate_unexpected_irq(u32 irqnr)

Same remark as on some other patches: you should be able to drop the
inline attribute without any ill effect. I'd also like this to be
renamed "gic_deactivate_spurious", or something similar.

> +{
> +     if (static_branch_likely(&supports_deactivate_key)) {
> +             if (irqnr < 8192)
> +                     gic_write_dir(irqnr);
> +     } else {
> +             gic_write_eoir(irqnr);
> +     }
> +}
> +
> +static inline void gic_handle_nmi(u32 irqnr, struct pt_regs *regs)
> +{
> +     int err;
> +
> +     if (static_branch_likely(&supports_deactivate_key))
> +             gic_write_eoir(irqnr);
> +     /*
> +      * Leave the PSR.I bit set to prevent other NMIs to be
> +      * received while handling this one.
> +      * PSR.I will be restored when we ERET to the
> +      * interrupted context.
> +      */
> +     err = handle_domain_nmi(gic_data.domain, irqnr, regs);

So this is the point where we start having a dependency on the NMI
series. We definitely need to start talking merge strategy.

> +     if (err)
> +             gic_deactivate_unexpected_irq(irqnr);
> +}
> +
>  static asmlinkage void __exception_irq_entry gic_handle_irq(struct pt_regs 
> *regs)
>  {
>       u32 irqnr;
>  
>       irqnr = gic_read_iar();
>  
> +     if (gic_supports_nmi() &&
> +         unlikely(gic_read_rpr() == GICD_INT_NMI_PRI)) {
> +             gic_handle_nmi(irqnr, regs);
> +             return;
> +     }
> +
>       if (gic_prio_masking_enabled()) {
>               gic_pmr_mask_irqs();
>               gic_arch_enable_irqs();
> @@ -403,12 +438,7 @@ static asmlinkage void __exception_irq_entry 
> gic_handle_irq(struct pt_regs *regs
>               err = handle_domain_irq(gic_data.domain, irqnr, regs);
>               if (err) {
>                       WARN_ONCE(true, "Unexpected interrupt received!\n");
> -                     if (static_branch_likely(&supports_deactivate_key)) {
> -                             if (irqnr < 8192)
> -                                     gic_write_dir(irqnr);
> -                     } else {
> -                             gic_write_eoir(irqnr);
> -                     }
> +                     gic_deactivate_unexpected_irq(irqnr);
>               }
>               return;
>       }
> -- 
> 1.9.1
> 

With the above addressed,

Acked-by: Marc Zyngier <[email protected]>

        M.

-- 
Jazz is not dead, it just smell funny.

Reply via email to