Am Donnerstag 02 August 2007 schrieb Martin Steigerwald: > The tone I see on responses to posts that are CCed to LKML in my > perception often is just completely and utterly awfully unfriendly. And > often those responses actual include factual inaccuracies and > preliminary assumptions as well. Is that how Linux Kernel Management > Style is supposed to work? I hope not. [...]
Well, if Carlo is not a Linux Kernel manager this comment of mine is inapprobiate. Sorry for that. Actually when I remind myself of all the responses I got from Ingo I did not see anything like that what I have complained about here. I take that as something where I can learn something: Not nearly every Linux Kernel manager is a mean and unfriendly bastard who accuses everyone who wants something merged or has a problem report. ;) (At least Ingo did not accuse me for my problem reports. If I ever happen to dig that deeply into the kernel or its documentation that I have something to merge regarding the scheduler, I can try how he reacts to that...) -- Martin 'Helios' Steigerwald - http://www.Lichtvoll.de GPG: 03B0 0D6C 0040 0710 4AFA B82F 991B EAAC A599 84C7 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/