4.14-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Anand Jain <anand.j...@oracle.com>

commit 0d228ece59a35a9b9e8ff0d40653234a6d90f61e upstream.

At the time of forced unmount we place the running replace to
BTRFS_IOCTL_DEV_REPLACE_STATE_SUSPENDED state, so when the system comes
back and expect the target device is missing.

Then let the replace state continue to be in
BTRFS_IOCTL_DEV_REPLACE_STATE_SUSPENDED state instead of
BTRFS_IOCTL_DEV_REPLACE_STATE_STARTED as there isn't any matching scrub
running as part of replace.

Fixes: e93c89c1aaaa ("Btrfs: add new sources for device replace code")
CC: sta...@vger.kernel.org # 4.4+
Signed-off-by: Anand Jain <anand.j...@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dste...@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dste...@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Sudip Mukherjee <sudipm.mukher...@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gre...@linuxfoundation.org>
---
 fs/btrfs/dev-replace.c |    2 ++
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)

--- a/fs/btrfs/dev-replace.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/dev-replace.c
@@ -804,6 +804,8 @@ int btrfs_resume_dev_replace_async(struc
                           "cannot continue dev_replace, tgtdev is missing");
                btrfs_info(fs_info,
                           "you may cancel the operation after 'mount -o 
degraded'");
+               dev_replace->replace_state =
+                                       BTRFS_IOCTL_DEV_REPLACE_STATE_SUSPENDED;
                btrfs_dev_replace_unlock(dev_replace, 1);
                return 0;
        }


Reply via email to