On 02/08/07, Al Viro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, Aug 02, 2007 at 10:03:03PM +0200, Jesper Juhl wrote: > > I believe Guennadi's point is that gcc does not warn about it in the > > case of c[4] = "0123"; but only in the case of c[4] = "01234" - so if > > we do have such initializations in the kernel we may have some bugs > > hiding there that gcc doesn't warn us about. > > Who said it's a bug? Or that all arrays of char have to contain '\0' > anywhere in them? > I was simply trying to explain what I thought Guennadi meant. I was not commenting on whether or not there's a bug there.
-- Jesper Juhl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Don't top-post http://www.catb.org/~esr/jargon/html/T/top-post.html Plain text mails only, please http://www.expita.com/nomime.html - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
