On 01/30/2019 07:19 PM, Boris Brezillon wrote:
> On Wed, 30 Jan 2019 15:08:33 +0000
> <tudor.amba...@microchip.com> wrote:
>
>> From: Tudor Ambarus <tudor.amba...@microchip.com>
>>
>> Let general names to core drivers.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Tudor Ambarus <tudor.amba...@microchip.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/spi/atmel-quadspi.c | 52
>> ++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------------
>> 1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/spi/atmel-quadspi.c b/drivers/spi/atmel-quadspi.c
>> index 64475ad16c83..e156c345705b 100644
>> --- a/drivers/spi/atmel-quadspi.c
>> +++ b/drivers/spi/atmel-quadspi.c
>> @@ -157,14 +157,14 @@ struct atmel_qspi {
>> struct completion cmd_completion;
>> };
>>
>> -struct qspi_mode {
>> +struct atmel_qspi_mode {
>> u8 cmd_buswidth;
>> u8 addr_buswidth;
>> u8 data_buswidth;
>> u32 config;
>> };
>>
>> -static const struct qspi_mode sama5d2_qspi_modes[] = {
>> +static const struct atmel_qspi_mode sama5d2_qspi_modes[] = {
>> { 1, 1, 1, QSPI_IFR_WIDTH_SINGLE_BIT_SPI },
>> { 1, 1, 2, QSPI_IFR_WIDTH_DUAL_OUTPUT },
>> { 1, 1, 4, QSPI_IFR_WIDTH_QUAD_OUTPUT },
>> @@ -175,18 +175,18 @@ static const struct qspi_mode sama5d2_qspi_modes[] = {
>> };
>>
>> /* Register access functions */
>> -static inline u32 qspi_readl(struct atmel_qspi *aq, u32 reg)
>> +static inline u32 atmel_qspi_readl(struct atmel_qspi *aq, u32 reg)
>> {
>> return readl_relaxed(aq->regs + reg);
>> }
>>
>> -static inline void qspi_writel(struct atmel_qspi *aq, u32 reg, u32 value)
>> +static inline void atmel_qspi_writel(struct atmel_qspi *aq, u32 reg, u32
>> value)
>> {
>> writel_relaxed(value, aq->regs + reg);
>> }
> Can we get rid of these wrappers? I'm not a big fan of wrappers that
> hide the fact that accesses are relaxed.
>
Will do, thanks!
ta
