Hi Valentin, On 31/01/2019 18:23, Valentin Schneider wrote: > Since the enabling and disabling of IRQs within preempt_schedule_irq() > is contained in a need_resched() loop, we don't need the outer arch > code loop. > > Reported-by: Julien Thierry <julien.thie...@arm.com> > Reported-by: Will Deacon <will.dea...@arm.com> > Signed-off-by: Valentin Schneider <valentin.schnei...@arm.com> > Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.mari...@arm.com> > Cc: Will Deacon <will.dea...@arm.com> > Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutl...@arm.com> > Cc: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyng...@arm.com> > Cc: Julien Grall <julien.gr...@arm.com> > Cc: Julien Thierry <julien.thie...@arm.com> > Cc: Thomas Gleixner <t...@linutronix.de> > Cc: linux-arm-ker...@lists.infradead.org
Reviewed-by: Julien Thierry <julien.thie...@arm.com> > --- > arch/arm64/kernel/entry.S | 11 +---------- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 10 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/entry.S b/arch/arm64/kernel/entry.S > index 0ec0c46b2c0c..4d0c81f29a60 100644 > --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/entry.S > +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/entry.S > @@ -611,7 +611,7 @@ el1_irq: > #ifdef CONFIG_PREEMPT > ldr x24, [tsk, #TSK_TI_PREEMPT] // get preempt count > cbnz x24, 1f // preempt count != 0 > - bl el1_preempt > + bl preempt_schedule_irq // irq en/disable is done inside > 1: > #endif > #ifdef CONFIG_TRACE_IRQFLAGS > @@ -620,15 +620,6 @@ el1_irq: > kernel_exit 1 > ENDPROC(el1_irq) > > -#ifdef CONFIG_PREEMPT > -el1_preempt: > - mov x24, lr > -1: bl preempt_schedule_irq // irq en/disable is done inside > - ldr x0, [tsk, #TSK_TI_FLAGS] // get new tasks TI_FLAGS > - tbnz x0, #TIF_NEED_RESCHED, 1b // needs rescheduling? > - ret x24 > -#endif > - > /* > * EL0 mode handlers. > */ > -- Julien Thierry
