On Mon, 28 Jan 2019 08:27:21 -0800 Christoph Hellwig <h...@infradead.org> wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 28, 2019 at 03:01:35PM +0100, Thomas Bogendoerfer wrote: > > On Mon, 28 Jan 2019 05:33:17 -0800 > > Christoph Hellwig <h...@infradead.org> wrote: > > > > > Shouldnt this just use chained irqchip drivers instead? > > > > you mean using irq_set_chained_handler() ? If yes, this IMHO doesn't look > > usefull > > because it's used for adding a secondary interrupt controller. But what I > > need > > is telling bridge ASIC to direct the xtalk IRQ packet to a specific > > HUB/HEART/BEDROCK > > from the HUB/HEART/BEDROCK specific code. And want to avoid dragging in > > bridge details > > to that specific code. > > Yes, but don't we have nested interrupt controllers here? Even if they > don't really do much in the fast path the setup does look chained to me. > Then again I'm not really an expert in the irq handling code nor in this > hardware, so maybe Thomas or Marc might have a better idea. found a presentation from Marc and what I need here is irqdomain hierarchy. Which meana converting the whole hub irq code to irqdomain first. Let's see how easy this will be:-) Thomas. -- SUSE Linux GmbH GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg)
