On Fri, 1 Feb 2019 11:04:16 +0100 Johan Hovold <jo...@kernel.org> wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 31, 2019 at 07:06:40PM +0100, Andreas Kemnade wrote:
> > The GTA04 has a w2sg0004 or w2sg0084 gps chip. Not detectable
> > which one is mounted so use the compatibility entry for w2sg0004
> > for all which will work for both.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Andreas Kemnade <andr...@kemnade.info>
> > ---
> > Changes in v3:
> > - converted to a patchset
> > - added vcc-supply
> >
> > Changes in v2:
> > - some s/gps/gnss/
> > - not added vcc-supply because the regulator is not modelled
> > in dts at all
> >
> > w2sg0004 bindings are in next-20190129
> >
> > arch/arm/boot/dts/omap3-gta04.dtsi | 14 ++++++++++++++
> > 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/omap3-gta04.dtsi
> > b/arch/arm/boot/dts/omap3-gta04.dtsi
> > index 02d8274a2f47..4ea0f7dc37c6 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/omap3-gta04.dtsi
> > +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/omap3-gta04.dtsi
> > @@ -320,6 +320,12 @@
> > >;
> > };
> >
> > + gps_pins: pinmux_gps_pins {
>
> s/gps/gnss/ would be more consistent, but whatever.
>
well, gps is already in the file at another place. So it is a bit
inconsistent in any case, without further cleanup. If someone comes
up with a strong opinion here I would of course change it.
Regards,
Andreas
pgpTR9t5O7ReK.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
