> > 
> >>    rx_chan = dma_request_slave_channel_reason(i2c_dev->dev, "rx");
> >>    if (IS_ERR(rx_chan))
> >>            return PTR_ERR(rx_chan); 
> >>
> >>
> >>> +
> >>> + dma_chan = dma_request_slave_channel_reason(i2c_dev->dev, "tx");
> >>> + if (IS_ERR(dma_chan)) {
> >>> +         err = PTR_ERR(dma_chan);
> >>> +         goto error;
> >>
> >> It's a good practice to release resources in opposite order to the 
> >> allocation. Hence better to write this as:
> >>
> >>            goto err_release_rx;
> >>
> >>> + }
> >>> +
> >>> + i2c_dev->tx_dma_chan = dma_chan;
> >>> +
> >>> + dma_buf = dma_alloc_coherent(i2c_dev->dev,
> >>> +                              i2c_dev->dma_buf_size, &dma_phys,
> >>> +                              GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_NOWARN);
> >>> +
> >>> + if (!dma_buf) {
> >>> +         dev_err(i2c_dev->dev, "failed to allocate the DMA buffer\n");
> >>> +         err = -ENOMEM;
> >>> +         goto error;
> >>
> >>            goto err_release_tx;
> >>
> >>> + }
> >>> +
> >>> + i2c_dev->dma_buf = dma_buf;
> >>> + i2c_dev->dma_phys = dma_phys;   
>
>       i2c_dev->rx_dma_chan = rx_chan;
> >>    i2c_dev->tx_dma_chan = tx_chan;
> >>
> >>> + return 0;
> >>> +
> >>> +error:
> >>> + if (i2c_dev->tx_dma_chan)
> >>> +         dma_release_channel(i2c_dev->tx_dma_chan);
> >>> +
> >>> + if (i2c_dev->rx_dma_chan)
> >>> +         dma_release_channel(i2c_dev->rx_dma_chan); 
> >>
> >> error_release_tx:
> >>    dma_release_channel(tx_chan);
> >> error_release_rx:
> >>    dma_release_channel(rx_chan);
> >>
> >>> +
> >>> + return err;
> > 
> > I am releasing resources in reverse order to allocation.
> > Trying for rx allocation followed by tx allocation During release 
> > releasing tx and then rx.
> > In case if tx allocation fails, doesn’t go thru release. If rx or buf 
> > allocation fails, releases tx first and then rx
> > 
>
>
> Okay. Anyway it's a good-n-common practice to write it in the way I'm 
> suggesting.
>
> And please set rx_chan and tx_chan after dma_buf allocation as I'm suggesting 
> because you current variant will crash kernel since if dma_buf allocation 
> fails, both rx and tx channels will be released and you're not setting them 
> to NULL in that case.

OK, my wrong assumption. Thought dma_release_channel will NULL chan after its 
freed
Will update and send V10

Reply via email to