On Thu, 21 Dec 2000, Andrea Arcangeli wrote: > It would also be nice if you could show a real life > showstopper-production-bottleneck where we need C) to fix it. I > cannot see any useful usage of C in production 2.2.x. Me neither. I'm just wondering at the reason why 2.2 semantics would be different than 2.4 ones now we still have the choice of just cut'n'pasting over the (working) code from 2.4... regards, Rik -- Hollywood goes for world dumbination, Trailer at 11. http://www.surriel.com/ http://www.conectiva.com/ http://distro.conectiva.com.br/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Re: Linux 2.2.19pre2 Kurt Garloff
- Re: Linux 2.2.19pre2 Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: Linux 2.2.19pre2 Andrew Morton
- Re: Linux 2.2.19pre2 Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: Linux 2.2.19pre2 Rik van Riel
- Re: Linux 2.2.19pre2 Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: Linux 2.2.19pre2 Andrew Morton
- Re: Linux 2.2.19pre2 Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: Linux 2.2.19pre2 Rik van Riel
- Re: Linux 2.2.19pre2 Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: Linux 2.2.19pre2 Rik van Riel
- Re: Linux 2.2.19pre2 Andrew Morton
- Re: Linux 2.2.19pre2 Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: Linux 2.2.19pre2 Andrew Morton
- Re: Linux 2.2.19pre2 Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: Linux 2.2.19pre2 Andrew Morton
- Re: Linux 2.2.19pre2 Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: Linux 2.2.19pre2 Andrew Morton
- Re: Linux 2.2.19pre2 Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: Linux 2.2.19pre2 Andrew Morton
- Re: Linux 2.2.19pre2 Andrea Arcangeli