On Mon, Feb 04, 2019 at 01:02:36PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 17, 2019 at 09:47:37AM +0100, Juri Lelli wrote:
> > @@ -3233,11 +3233,11 @@ void cpuset_cpus_allowed(struct task_struct *tsk,
> > struct cpumask *pmask)
> > {
> > unsigned long flags;
> >
> > - spin_lock_irqsave(&callback_lock, flags);
> > + raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&callback_lock, flags);
> > rcu_read_lock();
> > guarantee_online_cpus(task_cs(tsk), pmask);
> > rcu_read_unlock();
> > - spin_unlock_irqrestore(&callback_lock, flags);
> > + raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&callback_lock, flags);
> > }
> >
> > void cpuset_cpus_allowed_fallback(struct task_struct *tsk)
> > @@ -3285,11 +3285,11 @@ nodemask_t cpuset_mems_allowed(struct task_struct
> > *tsk)
> > nodemask_t mask;
> > unsigned long flags;
> >
> > - spin_lock_irqsave(&callback_lock, flags);
> > + raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&callback_lock, flags);
> > rcu_read_lock();
> > guarantee_online_mems(task_cs(tsk), &mask);
> > rcu_read_unlock();
> > - spin_unlock_irqrestore(&callback_lock, flags);
> > + raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&callback_lock, flags);
> >
> > return mask;
> > }
> > @@ -3381,14 +3381,14 @@ bool __cpuset_node_allowed(int node, gfp_t gfp_mask)
> > return true;
> >
> > /* Not hardwall and node outside mems_allowed: scan up cpusets */
> > - spin_lock_irqsave(&callback_lock, flags);
> > + raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&callback_lock, flags);
> >
> > rcu_read_lock();
> > cs = nearest_hardwall_ancestor(task_cs(current));
> > allowed = node_isset(node, cs->mems_allowed);
> > rcu_read_unlock();
> >
> > - spin_unlock_irqrestore(&callback_lock, flags);
> > + raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&callback_lock, flags);
> > return allowed;
> > }
>
> These three appear to be a user-controlled O(n) (depth of cgroup tree).
> Which is basically bad for raw_spinlock_t.
>
> The Changelog should really have mentioned this; and ideally we'd
> somehow avoid this.
N/m avoiding it; we have this all over the place, just mention it..
