On Mon, Feb 04, 2019 at 03:14:27PM +0000, Ghannam, Yazen wrote:
> Yes, you're right. But it seems that the next pr_* that's not a pr_cont will
> be on
> a newline automatically.
Ah, that must be that printk continuation fun around
4bcc595ccd80 ("printk: reinstate KERN_CONT for printing continuation lines")
> Should I add an explicit newline just to be sure we get one?
Nah, no need. If anything, we should strive to get rid of KERN_CONT, if
possible.
Thx.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
Good mailing practices for 400: avoid top-posting and trim the reply.
