On Mon, Feb 04, 2019 at 02:23:29PM -0800, kan.li...@linux.intel.com wrote:
> extern const struct x86_cpu_id *x86_match_cpu(const struct x86_cpu_id
> *match);
>
> +/*
> + * Match specific microcode revisions.
> + *
> + * vendor/family/model/stepping must be all set.
> + *
> + * only checks against the boot CPU. When mixed-stepping configs are
> + * valid for a CPU model, add a quirk for every valid stepping and
> + * do the fine-tuning in the quirk handler.
> + */
> +
> +struct x86_cpu_desc {
> + __u8 x86; /* CPU family */
> + __u8 x86_vendor; /* CPU vendor */
So Boris asked me to remove the tail comments (done), but what about I
do: % s/\<x86\>/&_family/g, on the rest of this too? I know we have
cpuinfo_x86::x86 history, but at some point we should rename that too.
> + __u8 x86_model;
> + __u8 x86_stepping;
> + __u32 x86_microcode_rev;
> +};
