On Tue, Feb 05, 2019 at 04:10:47PM +0100, Hannes Reinecke wrote: > On 2/5/19 3:52 PM, Keith Busch wrote: > > Whichever layer dispatched the IO to a CPU specific context should > > be the one to wait for its completion. That should be blk-mq for most > > block drivers. > > > Indeed. > But we don't provide any mechanisms for that ATM, right? > > Maybe this would be a topic fit for LSF/MM?
Right, there's nothing handling this now, and sounds like it'd be a good discussion to bring to the storage track.
