On 8/4/07, Muli Ben-Yehuda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sat, Aug 04, 2007 at 10:52:22PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > > On Sat, 4 Aug 2007 12:02:35 -0700 "Yinghai Lu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > On 8/4/07, Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > On Sat, 4 Aug 2007 10:45:31 -0700 "Yinghai Lu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > Andrew, > > > > > > > > > > still need > > > x86_64-get-mp_bus_to_node-as-early-v2.patch is already in the -mm > > > > > > it fixs > > > pirq_peer_trick(void) in irq.c > > > pcibios_fixup_peer_bridges in legacy.c > > > > > > by allocate sd. > > > > > > > I don't understand you much, sorry. Are you saying that > > x86_64-get-mp_bus_to_node-as-early-v2.patch should be merged in > > 2.6.23? > > If I may try to elaborate, yhlu is pointing out that the ->sysdata > conversion missed a couple of spots in i386 where we need to allocate > a pci_sysdata object as well. Unfortunately I don't think > x86_64-get-mp_bus_to_node-as-early-v2 is a suitable fix as it does a > whole bunch of other stuff too. I am now preparing a minimal patch > (based on x86_64-get-mp_bus_to_node-as-early-v2) that only takes care > of the missing ->sysdata bits. If that patch cures the original bug > and doesn't cause any more regressions, it's definitely 2.6.23 > material.
You just use my patch plus Andy's patch together... YH - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
