On Fri, Feb 08, 2019 at 06:26:15PM +0200, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: > On Fri, Feb 08, 2019 at 11:19:04AM -0500, Stefan Berger wrote: > > On 2/8/19 11:07 AM, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: > > > On Fri, Feb 08, 2019 at 10:45:53AM -0500, Stefan Berger wrote: > > > > On 2/8/19 10:42 AM, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: > > > > > On Fri, Feb 08, 2019 at 09:42:16AM -0500, Stefan Berger wrote: > On > > > > > 2/8/19 9:05 AM, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: > > > > > > At least tpm_nsc_send (tpm_nsc.c) and tpm_inf_send (tpm_infineon.c) > > > > > > are also > > > > > > returning the number of bytes sent. I would consider tpm_crb the > > > > > > outlier > > > > > > that returns 0 and should return the length even though we don't > > > > > > need it... > > > > > That would be absolutely wrong way the fix the *actual* issue i.e. > > > > > callbacks returning garbage (sometimes just passing the length > > > > > parameter > > > > > back as a return value). > > > > Then I guess you have to fixes those other two files as well... > > > That's still a better option. > > > > tpm_tis_core.c's tpm_tis_send_main() also needs fixing... > > Weird I had that fixed in my working area. Probably somehow managed > not to stage that change. It was like the very first things that > I fixed. Updating..
tpm_tis_send() would be the right function. /Jarkko
