On Mon 2007-08-06 13:15:17, Johannes Berg wrote:
> On Mon, 2007-08-06 at 12:26 +0200, Pavel Machek wrote:
>
> > Well, so that it does not bitrot? This is few bytes, I'd say, and I
> > believe we have too many config options already.
>
> This is not an option the user is ever going to see. I think I'd
> prefer
Ok, option that users can't set is probably not evil.
> having two new per-ARCH config symbols though:
> config SUSPEND_UP_POSSIBLE
> depends on ARCH_SUSPEND_UP_POSSIBLE
>
> and then the architecture gets to define that when it can suspend.
Looks like a plan.
Pavel
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures)
http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
