* Oleg Nesterov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 08/01, Gregory Haskins wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, 2007-08-02 at 02:22 +0400, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> >
> > > No,
> >
> > You sure are a confident one ;)
>
> Yeah, this is a rare case when I am very sure I am right ;)
>
> I strongly believe you guys take a _completely_ wrong approach.
> queue_work() should _not_ take the priority of the caller into
> account, this is bogus.
Oleg, i'd like to make it sure that the role of Gregory Haskins is clear
here: he submitted some new infrastructure into the -rt tree, and i
reviewed that but found it quite complex and duplicative and suggested
him to think about enhancing workqueues with priority properties - which
might or might not make sense.
It is not the intention of the -rt project to pester any upstream
maintainer with -rt issues if that upstream maintainer is not interested
in it ... so please just forget about all this if you are not interested
in it, we'll sort it out within -rt. Thanks,
Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
