On Tue, 12 Feb 2019, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Tue, 12 Feb 2019, Aubrey Li wrote:
>
> > The architecture specific information of the running processes could
> > be useful to the userland. Add support to examine process architecture
> > specific information externally.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Aubrey Li <[email protected]>
> > Cc: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]>
> > Cc: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>
> > Cc: Tim Chen <[email protected]>
> > Cc: Dave Hansen <[email protected]>
> > Cc: Arjan van de Ven <[email protected]>
> > ---
> > fs/proc/array.c | 5 +++++
> > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/fs/proc/array.c b/fs/proc/array.c
> > index 0ceb3b6b37e7..d8cb5b5fd7bb 100644
> > --- a/fs/proc/array.c
> > +++ b/fs/proc/array.c
> > @@ -392,6 +392,10 @@ static inline void task_core_dumping(struct seq_file
> > *m, struct mm_struct *mm)
> > seq_putc(m, '\n');
> > }
> >
> > +void __weak arch_proc_pid_status(struct seq_file *m, struct task_struct
> > *task)
> > +{
> > +}
>
> This still lacks a prototype.
Aside of that this doesn't apply to tip or Linus tree....
Thanks,
tglx
