pon., 11 lut 2019 o 14:08 Marc Zyngier <marc.zyng...@arm.com> napisał(a):
>
> On 11/02/2019 12:26, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> > From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszew...@baylibre.com>
> >
> > Raplace all calls to __raw_readl() & __raw_writel() with readl_relaxed()
> > and writel_relaxed() respectively. It's safe to do as there's no
> > endianness conversion being done in the code.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszew...@baylibre.com>
> > ---
> > arch/arm/mach-davinci/cp_intc.c | 4 ++--
> > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-davinci/cp_intc.c
> > b/arch/arm/mach-davinci/cp_intc.c
> > index c1efb9390655..4bbf0eba1920 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm/mach-davinci/cp_intc.c
> > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-davinci/cp_intc.c
> > @@ -45,13 +45,13 @@ static struct irq_domain *davinci_cp_intc_irq_domain;
> >
> > static inline unsigned int davinci_cp_intc_read(unsigned int offset)
> > {
> > - return __raw_readl(davinci_cp_intc_base + offset);
> > + return readl_relaxed(davinci_cp_intc_base + offset);
> > }
> >
> > static inline void davinci_cp_intc_write(unsigned long value,
> > unsigned int offset)
> > {
> > - __raw_writel(value, davinci_cp_intc_base + offset);
> > + writel_relaxed(value, davinci_cp_intc_base + offset);
> > }
> >
> > static void davinci_cp_intc_ack_irq(struct irq_data *d)
> >
>
> Same thing. Please merge this patch with the one that introduced the
> __raw_writel() stuff.
>
In this case, none of my patches introduced it - it used to be like
that from the beginning, so a separate patch is justified.
Bart
